Middle third Parasagittal Meningiomas at Kenyatta National Hospital: Report of Five Cases Demonstrating Surgical Nuances
Keywords:
Parasagittal meningioma, superior sagittal sinus, Kenyatta National HospitalAbstract
Background: Parasagittal meningiomas (PSMs) are among the most common intracranial meningiomas, comprising 20–30% of cases (1). They originate from the convexity dura adjacent to the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) and are often classified according to Olivecrona’s anatomical thirds (2,3). Surgical management is challenging due to venous sinus involvement and high recurrence rates (13–40%) (4). This study presents a series of five parasagittal meningiomas managed at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), highlighting the operative strategies, intraoperative findings, and surgical outcomes. Methods: Five patients with radiologically and histopathologically confirmed parasagittal meningiomas underwent surgical resection at KNH between 2024 and 2025Preoperative MRI assessed tumor location relative to the SSS and MRV to assess the patency of the SSS The surgical approach involved microsurgical excision using careful dissection of sinus wall attachments. Extent of resection was graded using the Simpson classification, and outcomes were evaluated based on postoperative neurological status, complications, and follow-up imaging over 3 months. Results: All the tumors were located in the middle third of the SSS. Four patients were female. Gross total resection (Simpson Grade II) was achieved in all 5 patients. Transient postoperative hemiparesis occurred in one patient. One tumor was noted to WHO grade II while the rest are WHO I . Four demonstrated clinical improvement and no early recurrence within 6 months. There was one mortality attributed to postoperative DVT. Conclusion: Parasagittal meningiomas remain a frequent but technically demanding subset of intracranial tumors. The middle third of the SSS is the most commonly affected region (5,6). Preservation of venous drainage, piecemeal resection, and meticulous hemostasis are essential for minimizing morbidity (7–10). The KNH experience underscores that with careful microsurgical technique and perioperative planning, favorable outcomes can be achieved even in resource-limited settings.
Downloads
References
1. Alvernia JE, Sindou MP. Parasagittal Meningiomas. In: Lee JH, ed. Meningiomas. Springer; 2009.
2. Cushing H, Eisenhardt L. Meningiomas: Their Classification, Regional Behavior, Life History, and Surgical End Results. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 1938.
3. Olivecrona H. The parasagittal meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 1947;4(4):327–341.
4. Petrella G, Piazza A, Fava A, et al. Parasagittal meningiomas: the impact of sinus opening and grade of resection on outcome. World Neurosurg. 2020;139:e1–e10.
5. Chege KK. Clinicoradiological pattern and early surgical outcome of parasagittal meningiomas at Kenyatta National Hospital [Master’s thesis]. University of Nairobi; 2023.
6. Eissa MF, El Hamed Zaki RA, El Noty NZAE. Management of parasagittal meningiomas invading the SSS. Sci J Al-Azhar Med Fac Girls. 2020;4(2):166–173.
7. Magill ST, Young JS, Chae R, Aghi MK, Theodosopoulos PV, McDermott MW. Relationship between tumor location, size, and WHO grade in meningioma. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;44(4):E4.
8. Mathiesen T. Parasagittal meningiomas. In: McDermott MW, ed. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Vol 170. Elsevier; 2020:93–100.
9. Pazhaniyandi A, Ramkumar RR. Retrospective analysis of parasagittal meningioma outcomes. Int Surg J. 2020;7(5):1436–1439.
10. Westerlund U, Linderoth B, Mathiesen T. Trigeminal complications after cranial base meningioma surgery. Neurosurg Rev. 2012;35(2):203–210
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 East African Journal of Neurological Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.